From what I have seen this new patch is great news for anyone outside of america, with the new game search system ACTUALLY checking your ping in the match, and making sure its below what is says. So far I have gotten games below 70 ping, and I LOVE IT. bout time you got the matchmaking right infinityward!
It's not worth the money, just more noobs and fail.
Just buy BC2 and be done with it.
Quote from: HamsterPants on March 31, 2010, 08:42:15 PM
It's not worth the money, just more noobs and fail.
Just buy BC2 and be done with it.
I wasnt talking about the maps >.> I meant the actual title update. !@#$ the maps.
Quote from: YayForLife on March 31, 2010, 09:14:11 PM
Quote from: HamsterPants on March 31, 2010, 08:42:15 PM
It's not worth the money, just more noobs and fail.
Just buy BC2 and be done with it.
I wasnt talking about the maps >.> I meant the actual title update. !@#$ the maps.
Well my bad. :P
Quote from: YayForLife on March 31, 2010, 05:00:10 PM
From what I have seen this new patch is great news for anyone outside of america, with the new game search system ACTUALLY checking your ping in the match, and making sure its below what is says. So far I have gotten games below 70 ping, and I LOVE IT. bout time you got the matchmaking right infinityward!
I'm super happy to hear that. They had like a 100 page topic of complains of how it did not do that.
@HamsterPants
Well maybe not worth it to you but to me i can get my moneys worth. Im still w8ting for it to come to pc.
Quote from: ARTgames on April 02, 2010, 12:42:54 PM
Quote from: YayForLife on March 31, 2010, 05:00:10 PM
From what I have seen this new patch is great news for anyone outside of america, with the new game search system ACTUALLY checking your ping in the match, and making sure its below what is says. So far I have gotten games below 70 ping, and I LOVE IT. bout time you got the matchmaking right infinityward!
I'm super happy to hear that. They had like a 100 page topic of complains of how it did not do that.
@HamsterPants
Well maybe not worth it to you but to me i can get my moneys worth. Im still w8ting for it to come to pc.
For me?
It's just a matter of realism, if you prefer games that have overpowered dual shotguns that you flip around, and an overall lack of
teamwork, then by all means, enjoy yourself.
I'll stick with the team oriented games, that have more realistic physics.
i enjoy modern warefare 2 except for some of the overpowered weps.
@HamsterPants
I don't have a problem with any shotguns, there are nerfed now. (BUT I HATE NOOB TOOOOB) Your also right that there is no real team work in the games unless you do forum a team like a good clan. My self i don't mind playing it every man to there self or team work. I don't think its fair to say it has no team work. You can if you find people who want to. And your right that the game is far from real. Real war is not fun and not balanced at all.
Maybe i don't take it as serious as other people do.
Also what game are you talking about?
Quote from: ARTgames on April 02, 2010, 05:36:19 PM
@HamsterPants
I don't have a problem with any shotguns, there are nerfed now. (BUT I HATE NOOB TOOOOB) Your also right that there is no real team work in the games unless you do forum a team like a good clan. My self i don't mind playing it every man to there self or team work. I don't think its fair to say it has no team work. You can if you find people who want to. And your right that the game is far from real. Real war is not fun and not balanced at all.
Maybe i don't take it as serious as other people do.
Also what game are you talking about?
Battlefield Bad Company 2
There's a thread about it here already.
Quote from: HamsterPants on April 02, 2010, 05:49:13 PM
Quote from: ARTgames on April 02, 2010, 05:36:19 PM
@HamsterPants
I don't have a problem with any shotguns, there are nerfed now. (BUT I HATE NOOB TOOOOB) Your also right that there is no real team work in the games unless you do forum a team like a good clan. My self i don't mind playing it every man to there self or team work. I don't think its fair to say it has no team work. You can if you find people who want to. And your right that the game is far from real. Real war is not fun and not balanced at all.
Maybe i don't take it as serious as other people do.
Also what game are you talking about?
Battlefield Bad Company 2
There's a thread about it here already.
Yeah, i made that topic! :D I do want that game also. Also don't get me wrong. I do think CODMW2 does have flaws.
@first post of this topic
"bout time you got the matchmaking right infinityward!" i wish they did not have it at all.
Quote from: HamsterPants on April 02, 2010, 03:22:09 PMIt's just a matter of realism
Ah! I hate this. I have a friend who won't play FPSs unless it uses the barrel sites (what is that called I'm blanking) instead of floating crosshairs. He says it's not realistic enough for him. It's a freaking game! If you want realism, go outside. There's a whole crap ton about the real world which is not fun. When I'm playing a GAME I want to have fun.
/rant
I think you just call them sites.
Any way i think some people want a game that is as real as the world but when you die you can respawn. I don't mind a game like that its just that i like every thing else in between also.
Quote from: Lingus on April 02, 2010, 07:16:17 PM
the barrel sites (what is that called I'm blanking) instead of floating crosshairs.
Iron Sights.
Quote from: Scotty on April 02, 2010, 08:29:32 PM
Quote from: Lingus on April 02, 2010, 07:16:17 PM
the barrel sites (what is that called I'm blanking) instead of floating crosshairs.
Iron Sights.
Thank you Scotty.
To be honest, I also prefer shooters that make you use the iron sights(unless you have a scope), but I don't have a problem with games that have reticles.
Do you all like 3ed person shooters?
Quote from: ARTgames on April 02, 2010, 10:40:38 PM
Do you all like 3ed person shooters?
It really just depends on the game.
For example, Warhawk is very solid, but the community ruins it.
What about games like quake and counter strike, 007, ect. They are not really war Sims but are still fps.
Quote from: Scotty on April 02, 2010, 08:29:32 PM
Quote from: Lingus on April 02, 2010, 07:16:17 PM
the barrel sites (what is that called I'm blanking) instead of floating crosshairs.
Iron Sights.
Thank you sir. That was kind of bugging me.
I love Uncharted 2 and playing L4D2 in third person and I am going to love Lead and Gold when I get it. Most people prefer FPS's though
Quote from: Pat on April 03, 2010, 04:07:51 AM
I love Uncharted 2 and playing L4D2 in third person and I am going to love Lead and Gold when I get it. Most people prefer FPS's though
Uncharted 2, so much good can be said for that game. Definitely the best 3PS I've ever played.
I'm a beast when I get the riot shield. 8)
Aaanyway, yeah, love L4D2, it's a great game, still kinda disappointing though, was hoping for something more, but it felt too much like a rehash of the first L4D.
GTA games have good third-person. I prefer fps though because I find it easier to aim.. Also in Fallout 3 the third person was hard to shoot with.
Quote from: stick d00d on April 03, 2010, 07:53:36 AM
GTA games have good third-person. I prefer fps though because I find it easier to aim.. Also in Fallout 3 the third person was hard to shoot with.
Agreed.
Of course it's easier to aim.
Yup.
Quote from: stick d00d on April 03, 2010, 07:53:36 AM
GTA games have good third-person. I prefer fps though because I find it easier to aim.. Also in Fallout 3 the third person was hard to shoot with.
yes
really? I don't find it any harder when using a mouse. Its easier some times because you can see more like you can see around stuff before you have to go out there. Using a controller on 3ed person is a diffrent story.
Well fallout3 was not really a good shooting game.
Quote from: ARTgames on April 03, 2010, 01:09:54 PM
Well fallout3 was not really a good shooting game.
It depends on what gaming engine it's for.
And for what it's worth, the shooting is very unique.
I never did have any problem with Fallout 3's shooting system. It was a little more difficult than most, sure, but made it more realistic for me. I enjoyed turning off the HUD, crosshairs and all, and just aiming with the gun, and I do that for any shooter that allows it. The more realistic the experience, the more fun I have, to the point that I make 8| faces at shooters who don't use a clip system. I remember playing Medal of Honor Allied Assault back in the day, me and my brother would stick in hacks that made our view third person instead of first, and have mini battles with one-shot snipers.
Quote from: Lucifer on April 03, 2010, 03:20:56 PM
I never did have any problem with Fallout 3's shooting system. It was a little more difficult than most, sure, but made it more realistic for me. I enjoyed turning off the HUD, crosshairs and all, and just aiming with the gun, and I do that for any shooter that allows it. The more realistic the experience, the more fun I have, to the point that I make 8| faces at shooters who don't use a clip system. I remember playing Medal of Honor Allied Assault back in the day, me and my brother would stick in hacks that made our view third person instead of first, and have mini battles with one-shot snipers.
Yea I liked the shooting in Fallout 3 simply because it was more of a challenge then most FPS games.. except for the VATS shooting ofc. Also you had to keep your weapons repaired pretty well to be able to do some good dmg. Can't wait for New Vegas.
Really now? Fallout 3 fps part felt like a free or open source fps with nice graphics. The guns just seem to fire with really random accuracy, making lining up shots almost useless. The lasers/plasmas guns just fired in the same spot on the screen making them easy to use.
There no recoil system, moving speed accuracy, sway, etc. The vat system makes up for its mediocre combat system so im ok with that. Now i do like love the game fallout 3. Fallout with all its pieces put together is an awesome game.